BetterDonkey.org

Skip to content




Bus Rapid Transit makes perfect sense for Seattle

Submitted by ezra on April 12, 2006 - 7:18pm.

All it takes is a little inspiration and some political will to get the ball rolling with creating Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) in the Seattle region. While rail transit is an important strategy for connecting urban centers and serving neighborhoods, building new rail infrastructure takes time and funding to complete.

For Bus Rapid Transit, the infrastructure already exists, because the streets are already built! A new network of BRT routes, traveling in separate bus lanes on existing streets, could just take several years to complete. Just imagine how exciting it would be to have BRT routes criss-crossing the metro area, connecting neighborhoods and providing mobility throughout the region by the end of this decade.

In Curitiba, Brazil the city has spent decades building a BRT system. This system has inspired many cities throughout the world because in Curitiba they don’t wish they had a rapid system, they’ve built one, and because it’s a system of buses, it’s not cost prohibitive to operate.

A new dawn for urban planning can emerge for Seattle. We see this happening already with the leadership from Mayor Nickels as the organizer of the alliance of cities in support of the Kyoto treaty. Creating new transit service and a better transit system is at the top of the list of our own Green Ribbon Commission’s recommendations for combating global warming and environmental destruction. A new BRT system will do just this.

Urban Transit

Seattle PI article about Curitiba, Brazil

I'm pretty cool on the idea. I mean off grade is still the key. The bus tunnel is BRT in the city. But other than that, it's tough to see where you would put it in the denser areas of the city.

Submitted by Carl Ballard (not verified) on April 12, 2006 - 8:40pm.

BRT advocates always talk out of both sides of their mouth. When they talk about cost, they say...it uses the streets! When they talk about speed and reliability they speak of dedicated busways. Dedicated busways are almost as expensive as rail. The types of BRT Seattle is talking about are incremental improvements that are helpful, but anything but "rapid"

The term is so vague as to be almost useless. Before you stump for BRT, define your terms and what you envision us doing. A dedicated lane will work on North Aurora and 15th NW, but to implement more will mean major construction.

Submitted by surf logs kill (not verified) on April 14, 2006 - 4:30pm.

I just rode Boston's version of BRT, The Silver Line. I have to say, it's not that great. Supposedly it has it's own lane, but people have their cars double parked in the lane and at the stops all along the route. This slows the bus down significantly. I challenge any proponent of BRT to ride Boston's Silver Line and tell me that they think that's rapid transit.

Submitted by jen (not verified) on June 16, 2006 - 10:36am.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.