Governor lacks leadership on viaduct
The Governor made a big mistake by asking for input from Seattle voters on the viaduct. The whole viaduct debate is a falsely framed debate that will be made even more confusing by a public vote. Understanding the complexities of how the different proposed replacements will be funded and whose pocket that funding comes out of will not be clear to voters.
The fact that a reduced capacity tunnel or surface expressway, are not on the table also limits the choices presented to voters. Voters will be asked to choose between the two most auto-oriented proposals, and that simply doesn’t make sense, not for transit, the environment or the future of a livable Seattle.
If a public vote is inevitable, as it now appears, many choices should appear on a ballot. The public should vote using Instant Run Off Voting (IRV). IRV would allow voters to express their first, second and third choices, and give elected officials the ability to see these results. Only having two choices is an outmoded voting method, and in this case will really skew what the true public opinion is.
Like most tax issues that reach the ballot, I think the viaduct vote will largely boil down to the typical division in Seattle of home-owners versus renters, a division of young liberal Seattle and old conservative Seattle. The property owners have their yards, views and most of all semi-annual tax bills, reminding them about their obligations to our schools, parks, state and local governments. Those are the no-voters. They have the advantage, because they are the voters who vote in special and primary elections, and they don't see the need for a waterfront for all.
Cross Posted on Urban Transit



Recent comments