BetterDonkey.org

Skip to content




Roads & Rails Fails ... Now What?

Submitted by grant on November 7, 2007 - 9:08am.

Well, The Stranger Election Board, The Sierra Club, Tim Eyman & Dino Rossi, The Seattle Times, KVI & Right Wing Talk Radio, SoundPolitics and the Anti-Infrastructure crowd made a strange bunch of bed-fellows and, together, they defeated 50 miles of light rail. Actually, they shot it in the back of the head.

I understood the concern about the growth in roads, I truly did. While I was an unapologetic supporter of RTID, I did have lingering doubts about the amount of roads we were going to be building. But, like Dan Savage told the Sierra Club last night, "I didn’t care if they paved all those new roads with baby mice, I wanted 50 miles of light rail."

The perfect storm was created, and so goes 50 miles of light rail which we won't ever get back in one package. And, in a nutshell, that was my greatest fear... what I predicted in the comment section of my last entry would happen if it failed:

"You can bet that if Prop 1 fails, it will take 3-7 years for another Proposition to surface and you can also bet that it will have far less light rail up for vote as the interpretation the pols will get from a failure of Prop 1 won't be "think big" but "think calculated risk"

I was concerned that RTID would fail, but I wasn't prepared for the outright slaughter it endured. "Think Calculated Risk" looks like the bright side now. A slight loss would perhaps made the Pols think that, if only they split RTID into a light rail vote and a road vote, they could have passed the light rail section (with all the loud environmental uproar over the roads not being a factor this time). And, while I think that's still true - that a light rail proposition could definitely win a broad support of voters in 2008 - the daunting numbers of last night scare the Pols shitless now. And now, here comes the Seattle Times Danny Westneat to tell them what to think about the results of a massive RTID loss in his editorial today:

So I say forget it. Forget the big fixes and the megaprojects. Forget extending light rail, or any new freeways.

It's time to think smaller. Much smaller...

Big new stuff? Forget it. It costs too much. And there's too little trust.

Speaking of trust, Sound Transit should just go away and finish building its line from downtown to the airport that's now 80 percent done. After it opens, two years from now, then maybe we can talk about building more.

So, to the pro-light rail, anti-prop 1 crowd, the onus is now on you. This sort of thinking should scare you to no end, and this is what you're up against now. You got us into this mess. You helped create a perfect storm. I was willing to compromise for 50 Damn Miles of Light Rail but that wasn't good enough. So now, you are the ones that have the biggest reason to step up to the plate. What is the way forward? Please, speak up.

Related Links
Slog - A Little Good News On Election Night (Nov 7, 2007)
The Seattle Times - Danny Westneat Editorial - After 15 votes, let's think smaller (Nov 7, 2007)

The political considerations that were used in creating the list of projects in Prop. 1 rang alarm bells with many people I discussed it with.

People saw the electoral strategy of catering to both transit voters and roads supporters as little more than logrolling.

The combination drove the cost too high and the bond repayment period too long. One person told me no one has any business doing either because the economy, energy resources, in-migration, and availability of new technology cannot be reliably projected that far into the future.

Moreover, the political basis of the project list meant the roads would be locking-in current, not necessarily smart land use and development patterns.

I would favor a near term strategy of bringing back the various parts of Prop. 1 and letting people pick and choose-- 520 replacement, and a case can also be made for light rail from Everett to Tacoma, I think, as long as express service is emphasized. What shouldn't be proposed are little pieces of streetcar here and there and then completing the missing links later.

I personally think intercity rail service is a huge unmet market, and it should run from Bellingham to Vancouver WA. Spokane too. Perhaps elevated LRT in the I-5 right of way, and Eurostar-type trains along I-90. There really is no good alternative to driving in these corridors -- Amtrak and Sounder just don't run often enough.

But what progressives need to worry about more, I think, is what looks like taxpayer fatigue that is more significant than we previously thought.

Submitted by David (not verified) on November 7, 2007 - 12:52pm.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

*
*
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


*

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <blockquote> <small>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.