BetterDonkey.org

Skip to content




Save the Statewide Road Safety and Repair Program!

Submitted by grant on July 25, 2005 - 7:15pm.



Another way to frame the coming war over I-912


I-912 will make the ballot this fall. For those of you that don't know what this initiative is, it calls for the repeal of the Statewide Road Safety and Repair Program.

You've never heard of the Statewide Road Safety and Repair Program? I bet it's because I'm the first one to ever use that term. But, it's time for those who support a vibrant and safe infrastructure for this state to begin using terms like that. They're blunt, they're to the point and - they're true.

Don't let them tell you any different. We live in an age when the term "tax" is about as desirable as a colonoscopy to 60% of the public. Why bother defending a tax? Why bother explaining complexities like the fact that the gas tax which will fund the Road Safety and Repair Program simply keeps up with inflation? We live in an era where complexity equals tuning out. Cut to the damn chase.

The legislature has enacted a Road Safety and Repair program. A local right-wing talk radio station has used this vital public safety issue as a publicity stunt. Using the public airwaves, they have single handedly promoted their extremist propaganda. Right-wing talk radio would rather have high ratings over the safety of Washington residents. They're still thinking of the Governor's race, while the legislature is thinking of our future. These extremists have decided to knock down public safety, but have given no solutions to the problem.

In fact, the extremists who have attacked the Road Safety and Repair Program are so far out of the main stream, they're at odds with Chris Vance and the Washington State Republican Party.

(click "Read More" to continue)

PI columnist Joel Connelly wants you to believe the fight is almost already over and that the extremists have won. The Stranger thinks we should tell Eastern Washington to go screw themselves and focus on the west.

They're both right in some regard. We can't win by pandering to the East and, we don't really need them to win anyways. Connelly hits the nail on the head, too. Simply running the same campaign that we've run against other Anti-Progress Initiatives will produce the same results- failure.

So, why bother running a campaign defending a tax? Why not call I-912 what is truly is- an initiative which is attacking our Statewide Road Safety and Repair program.

We're on the side of safety. We're on the side of progress. We're on the side of commuters. We're on the side of protecting the future of the state of Washington.

They're against it. And they're going to lose.

If we can tell the truth about our our Statewide Road Safety and Repair Program being threatened.

Related Links:
Washington Defense - Projects I-912 Will Kill
Seattle PI - Joel Connelly - I-912 Has Familiar Twists and Turns
Horsesass.org - Charting the gas tax’s steady decline
The Stranger - The Western Strategy
Seattle PI - Gas-tax Talk: Jabber over journalism
The Seattle Times - Gasoline tax fuels backlash
Keep Washington Rolling - Debunking I-912
Horsesass.org - Dino Rossi opposes I-912

Photoshop and slow days at work. Fantastic!

Submitted by Benny G on July 26, 2005 - 11:25am.

editing me. now i must register you for many many email newlsetters. I hope you enjoy daily updates from the Black Panthers.

Submitted by Benny G on July 26, 2005 - 12:24pm.

Ring Ring Ring, it's the 8.5 billion dollar clue phone. Guess you should answer. The 'extremists' which you so ineloquently characterized want one thing, accountability. We're tired of the same old Liberal strategy of 'throwing more money at something and getting nothing in return'. Seattle hasn't had an infrastructure upgrade in 25 years. Why? We've had all sorts of revenue, car ownership has gone up and so has resultant taxation of said cars. Gas tax has gone up. But still we're stuck with the same old crappy roads. Liberalism is has made perpetuating miserable conditions a science. They do it with welfare, they do it with roads, they do it with healthcare, ad naseum.

Right Wingers have no problem paying for money when they get something in return. Liberals equate spending more with doing more, and that's simply incorrect. Who put forth the performance audit initiative? Right Wingers. Who had to expose election incompetence? Right Wingers. Plain and simple we're tired of blue ribbon committees, no bid union contracts and supposed 'environmental studies', all of which only serve one purpose, to line the pockets of special interests.

What you forget is what the WA state constitution says:"All political power is inherent in the people, and governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, and are established to protect and maintain individual rights"

The people of washington are tired of the legislature passing 'emergency clauses' to push through their agenda which caters to special interests. It's unethical, unconstitutional, and it's just plain wrong. Washington is only a Blue state because the Liberal agenda makes people sad.

Submitted by Anonymous Coward (not verified) on August 7, 2005 - 1:03pm.

Conservatives can talk about accountability all they want, but what they are really saying is “I don’t want to pay for it.” What’s worse is that they only oppose spending when they don’t see a direct benefit. I guarantee you if this was some pork barrel project in this commenter’s neighborhood he wouldn't be talking about accountability.

Republicans are perfectly willing to foolishly spend money as long as goes to a narrow intrest group, rather than benifit the public. Look at the latest energy bill and their $1.5 billion giveaway to big oil, or Rick Santorum's bill to make it illegal for the National Weather Service to give the public the data they collect.

If accountability was what conservatives were really worried about, then they would be putting forth their own plan to fix our failing transportation infrastructure rather than just being obstructionist.

In fact, accountability is exactly what this author is complaining about. Accountability is why we have blue ribbon commissions and environmental impact statements. It is the cost of thinking a problem through and making sure it is done right. The commenter may think its wise to skimp on planning, but the reality is that this type of planning is needed. I wish we would have had a few more blue ribbon commissions looking into Iraq before we decided to invade. We might have saved thousands of lives and billions of dollars.

The reality is that public investment built this nation and if Washington is going to continue to prosper, some of us are going to have to forgo the second DVD player for the guest bedroom and fork over the money to prevent the Alaska Way Viaduct and 520 from collapsing.

Submitted by chrisz on August 7, 2005 - 8:46pm.

so, you don't want to raise the gas tax. what do you think the answer is, then? how would you fix the viaduct, the 520 bridge and the thousands of other roads that this program will fix.

don't give me that "liberal government" bullshit, either. these corporations are fighting against I-912:

• The Boeing Company
• Hal Woosley Properties
• Microsoft
• Parsons Brinckerhoff
• Parametrix
• PEMCO Financial Services
• Seattle Mariners
• Vulcan Inc.
• Washington Mutual
• Weyerhaeuser

yeah, those guys are a bunch of liberal blowhards, right? no, they're not. chris vance- the chairman of the republican party in washington state is against I-912. slade gorton has been against these anti-tax Initiatives before, and i'll bet he speaks up against this one as well.

face it, you're a greedy asshole who doesn't want to give up literally less than $0.50 per week to fix major problems with your state. you can't see more than 10 feet in front of you, and you don't care what happens to your fellow citizens, your children or your neighbors. you'd rather have your $0.50.

you're truly an upstanding citizen.

p.s. "Washington is only a Blue state because the Liberal agenda makes people sad."

What the hell does that mean? People in Washington like to be sad, so they vote liberal? That doesn't make any sense. Please, elaborate.

Submitted by grant on August 8, 2005 - 10:38am.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.